Rejuvenator tote connected by hose to a metering skid beside asphalt plant equipment in Emily, Minnesota.

Emily, Minnesota: SIP-1111™ in the TH 6 Recycling-Agent Study

On Trunk Highway 6 near Emily, Minnesota, a field study put seven recycling agents into 40% reclaimed asphalt pavement mixtures and tracked them beside 30% and 40% RAP controls. SIP-1111™ appears in the report as 6003 (D1), US Soybean. The project provides a direct comparison across recovered-binder grade, mixture rheology, cracking tests, and field distress.

Three-year black-space plot from the Emily report comparing all seven recycling-agent sections and the control mixtures at 20 degrees Celsius and 5 hertz.
Figure 3-13(c) from Long-term Testing and Analysis on Asphalt Mix RA Field Sections, showing the three-year black-space comparison at 20°C and 5 Hz.

Project design

The National Road Research Alliance sections were constructed in August 2019. All seven recycling-agent mixtures used a PG 58-28 base binder, 40% RAP, and a supplier-selected dosage intended to reach a recovered grade of XX-34. The report identifies three controls: 30% RAP (D0), 40% RAP (D1), and 40% RAP (D2).

Code Report description As-extracted continuous PG RAP
6001 Cargill 58.1-37.6 40%
6002 Poet 61.4-38.8 40%
6003 US Soybean / SIP-1111™ 54.9-38.4 40%
6004 Ingevity 62.6-33.7 40%
6005 Kraton 61.7-34.7 40%
6006 Asphalt and Wax Innovations 66.8-30.5 40%
6007 Georgia Pacific 70.5-33.2 40%

Three-year phase angle and dynamic modulus

At 20°C and 5 Hz, Figure 3-13(c) places 6003 at approximately 32 degrees phase angle and 2,600 MPa |E*|. Those are respectively the highest phase angle and lowest dynamic modulus among the seven recycling-agent sections. The nearest recycling-agent comparator is 6005 at approximately 29 degrees and 3,100 MPa. In this plot, higher phase angle and lower |E*| indicate a softer mixture with more relaxation capacity under the stated test condition.

The metrics identify different strengths. The phase-angle and |E*| comparison favors 6003, the DCT result favors 6005, and the rutting data show no positive 6003 distinction.

Glover-Rowe results

In the mixture Glover-Rowe analysis, lower and more-negative change relative to the 40% D1 control is favorable. The report identifies 6003 and 6005 as the two exceptions to the general decline in recycling-agent effectiveness as field cores aged.

Emily report figures comparing Day 1 recovered-binder Glover-Rowe values and black-space position after laboratory aging.
Figures 4-11 and 4-12. After seven days at 95°C, 6003 is the only Day 1 recycling-agent section below both controls on binder Glover-Rowe, although every section is above the report’s warning threshold.

Recovered-binder grades

The as-extracted 6003 binder grades PG 52-34 under AASHTO M 320. After three years, binder recovered from the 6003 section grades PG 58-28, with continuous grade 62.1-33.5, while the 40% RAP Day 1 control grades PG 64-22, with continuous grade 72.0-27.7. The three-year samples came from small-cylinder specimens, so the report cautions against treating them as directly interchangeable with prior-year top-core samples.

Field cracking context

Emily report chart comparing transverse cracking in recycling-agent and control sections through three years of field surveys.
Figure 5-1. The recycling-agent sections, including 6003, had less transverse cracking than the 40% RAP Day 1 control through three years; they did not outperform the 30% RAP control.

What the project establishes

Emily shows how SIP-1111™ behaved in one 40% RAP field design against a full recycling-agent set and two RAP levels of control mixture. The strongest 6003 results are the three-year phase-angle and |E*| position, project-specific PG 52-34 recovery, relative binder Glover-Rowe behavior after severe aging, and participation in the lower-cracking recycling-agent group. The DCT lead for 6005 and the rutting result complete the project tradeoff.

Review SIP-1111™ · See related demonstration projects · Discuss a high-RAP application with SoyLei

Source Documents

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *