Street map of Janesville centered on the SIP-1111 project location on North Claremont Drive.

Janesville, Wisconsin: An Equal-Dose 40% Recycled-Binder Comparison

On October 24, 2020, Rock Road Companies produced a head-to-head rejuvenator comparison for a City of Janesville paving section on North Claremont Drive. The 5 LT hot-mix asphalt used a 46-34 virgin binder and 40% aged-binder replacement. One project mixture contained 0.5% SIP-1111™ on total asphalt-cement content; the comparator used the same dosage of Anova.

The project put equal-dose rejuvenator formulations into a full-scale city paving program, then carried material from the comparison into laboratory performance testing. The result is a practical data set for producers evaluating high-recycled-content mixtures without changing the additive dosage between products.

Equal dosage with direct cracking-test results

Iowa State University tested three project-mixture specimens from each 0.5% formulation in the disk-shaped compact tension test. The SIP-1111™ specimens averaged 358 J/m² of DCT fracture energy, compared with 355 J/m² for Anova. Air voids across the six specimens ranged from 6.87% to 7.48%.

Three additional specimens per formulation were evaluated with IDEAL-CT. SIP-1111™ produced an average CT index of 193.5, compared with 188.2 for Anova, at specimen air voids ranging from 6.8% to 7.4%.

Project-sample test 0.5% SIP-1111™ 0.5% Anova
Average DCT fracture energy 358 J/m² 355 J/m²
Average IDEAL-CT index 193.5 188.2

Pretrial testing against both Anova and an untreated control

Rock Road Companies also evaluated the 5 LT 46-34 design before field production. In that laboratory study, the 0.5% SIP-1111™ mixture recorded 410.7 J/m² of DCT fracture energy. The matching 0.5% Anova design measured 403.3 J/m², while the no-additive design measured 356.7 J/m².

Hamburg wheel-track testing ran through 20,000 passes. The SIP-1111™ design recorded a stripping inflection point of 19,949 passes and 5.5 mm final rut depth. The Anova design recorded 17,020 passes and 6.5 mm; the no-additive design recorded 16,085 passes and 6.5 mm.

Pretrial laboratory result 0.5% SIP-1111™ 0.5% Anova No additive
DCT fracture energy 410.7 J/m² 403.3 J/m² 356.7 J/m²
Hamburg stripping inflection point 19,949 passes 17,020 passes 16,085 passes
Hamburg final rut depth 5.5 mm 6.5 mm 6.5 mm

Plant-ready delivery for a high-recycled-content mix

Rock Road Companies injected the liquid additive into the asphalt-cement line immediately before the binder entered the plant’s dual drum. That production arrangement moved SIP-1111™ directly from a tote into the 40% recycled-binder mixture and supplied project material for independent testing.

What Janesville demonstrates

Janesville established an equal-dose field comparison in a demanding recycled-binder application. At 0.5% additive, the SIP-1111™ project samples averaged 358 J/m² DCT fracture energy and 193.5 IDEAL-CT; the Anova samples averaged 355 J/m² and 188.2. The supporting pretrial study added no-additive context and recorded the highest DCT fracture energy, highest Hamburg stripping inflection point, and lowest final rut depth among the three 5 LT 46-34 designs.

Two zero-based panels compare Janesville field-sample means. SIP-1111 records DCT fracture energy 358 versus 355 joules per square meter for Anova, and IDEAL-CT Index 193.5 versus 188.2.
Janesville equal-dose field-sample comparison The equal-dose field-sample averages were close, with SIP-1111™ slightly higher on both measures.

Higher DCT fracture energy and IDEAL-CT Index are favorable; zero-based scales avoid exaggerating the small differences.

Janesville equal-dose field-sample means.
Treatment Dosage (%) Specimens DCT fracture energy (J/m²) IDEAL-CT Index
Anova 0.5 3 355 188.2
SIP-1111™ 0.5 3 358 193.5

Source: Reviewed Janesville Wisconsin Mix Performance Tables. Gmail message 175adca312f962db, DCT and IDEAL-CT specimen tables; accepted project packet takes precedence over the later transposed deck labels

Explore SIP-1111™ · See more demonstration projects · Discuss a high-recycled-content asphalt formulation with SoyLei

Source Documents

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *