A North Claremont Drive field trial paired 40% aged-binder replacement with 0.5% SIP-1111™. DCT averaged 358 versus 355 J/m² and IDEAL-CT averaged 193.5 versus 188.2 for the same mixture with 0.5% Anova.
A Blankenship Asphalt Tech & Training study compared two bio-oil formulations in an engineered 45% RAP mixture and measured the balance between IDEAL-CT cracking tolerance and Hamburg rutting resistance.
In a blinded ATS comparison, two SIP-1111™ treatments produced the study's two lowest Hamburg deformation values while preserving the full cracking and dosage-efficiency context.
The Lower Road demonstration used SIP-1111™ to formulate PG 58-28 binder from hard 30-penetration asphalt. The 30% RAP mix raised the reported cracking-test indices and recorded 5.1 mm Hamburg deformation versus 4.5 mm for the 15% RAP control at 45°C.
A full-scale Missouri demonstration compared control, 1.75%, and 3.5% SIP-1111™ sections in a 35% RAP mix, followed by CT Index, DCT, and I-FIT testing at Iowa State University.
NCAT Section S1 combined 50% RAP with 4.1% SIP-1111™ and recorded no visible cracking with less than 3.5 mm rut depth after one year and about 4 million ESALs.
A 500-ton Indianapolis parking-lot trial compared 40% RAP with SIP-1111™ against a 25% RAP control, measuring recovered-binder, DCT, and Hamburg performance.